aarot.blogg.se

1. #EXIF DATA VIEWER IP SERIAL NUMBER#
2. #EXIF DATA VIEWER IP SOFTWARE#
3. #EXIF DATA VIEWER IP TRIAL#
4. #EXIF DATA VIEWER IP PROFESSIONAL#

The forensic examiner, Brian Booth testified that the most reliable metadata that the FBI could obtain from the images on the Western digital hard drive, said that they were taken exactly when the folders stated they were taken.” Prosecutor Mark J. “Now you also know that the photographs were taken in 2005 because that’s what the data shows. What he told the jury was reinforced by prosecutors in their closing statements.

#EXIF DATA VIEWER IP SOFTWARE#

“Most commercial software will not touch EXIF data.”.“ stays into that photo and it’s very hard to remove.”.His testimony included some unambiguous statements about EXIF data: You can read Booth’s testimony June 12 and June 13.

#EXIF DATA VIEWER IP TRIAL#

#EXIF DATA VIEWER IP PROFESSIONAL#

Professional photographers use EXIF data to see the time and date they took the picture and the camera settings used. EXIF data can be viewed on the photo file’s “properties.” You do not see EXIF data when you look at the photo. What Is EXIF Data?ĮXIF data is a set of information embedded into a photo by the digital camera that takes the picture. The hard drive, found in Raniere’s library, contained the Camila photos with their EXIF data intact, prosecutors said. The Dell Dimension computer was never found.įinally, a Western Digital hard drive was used to back up the Camila photos from the Dell computer. However, the photos of camila were also not found on the camera card.įrom the camera card, the photos were downloaded to a Dell Dimension 8300 computer. The photos, however, were not found on the camera.Ī Lexar camera card was used to transfer the photos from the camera and store them. The photos were not found on the camera or its camera card, which were also seized.Īccording to the prosecution, the EXIF data remained embedded in the photos unaltered when the camera transferred the photos of Camila to a camera card, then to a Dell computer, and finally to a backup hard drive.Ī Canon Camera EOS 20D was used to take 14 photos of Camila on Novem– and 8 more photos of her on November 24, 2005. This was the proof of possession of child porn and sexual exploitation of a child: The EXIF data, which Booth testified was hard to change, showed when the photos were taken via Raniere’s camera, in November 2005, when Camila was 15.

#EXIF DATA VIEWER IP SERIAL NUMBER#

The jury was told that the most reliable proof was the EXIF data.ĮXIF data was used to prove that 14 photos of Camila were taken on November 2, 2005, during the period from 5:59:16 PM to 6:09:11 PM – and that 8 more photos of Camila were taken on November 24, 2005, starting at 6:07:50 PM and completing the last shot about three minutes later, at 6:10:38 PM.ĮXIF data also showed the serial number of the Canon EOS 20D, which was the same as the camera seized from Raniere’s library. The most reliable evidence of the dating of the photos, as the FBI Forensic Examiner Booth said, was EXIF data. It is also easy to understand the motive to lie by the FBI in this high-profile case.

It is easy to understand the motives of Raniere or his supporters. It is of interest, however, to probe whether an FBI agent lied on the stand – and lied about something that is easily verifiable. It does not prove the pictures were not actually of Camila when she was 15. It does not prove tampering if Booth lied. It won’t change a thing about the Raniere case even if Booth lied. Let us only consider the veracity of statements made by FBI Senior Forensic Examiner Booth about EXIF data, to the effect that EXIF data is hard to remove or change. That is expected to be the “newly discovered evidence” that would be the basis for a federal rule 33 motion Raniere may file Camila did not testify at Raniere’s trial but publicly said later that he began sexually abusing her when she was 15, including taking photos of her.įorget also whether the FBI tampered with the photos to convict Raniere. Keith Raniere in his library where the hard drive with Cami’s photos was found.įorget, for a moment, whether Raniere took or possessed photos of Camila when she was 15. In short, Suneel says that Brian Booth lied. Suneel Chakravorty, a supporter of Raniere who is well-known to many Frank Report readers, says that EXIF data is easy to change and that Booth, as a senior forensic examiner, certainly knows this. In our last post, Frank Report reviewed the testimony of FBI Senior Forensic Examiner Brian Booth in the trial of Keith Raniere as it related to using EXIF data to reliably date the creation of digital photos.īooth said EXIF data is hard to remove or change.